Latest




World's best practice?<> Smell<> Air quality<> Log trucks and other HGVs<> Effluent<> Water<> Fogs and smogs<> Noise <> Visual aspect <> Health<> Logging<> Accidents<> Choice of site<> Financial<> Final verdict

LATEST NEWS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Back to main page

This section follows the news trail right back to the original IIS:

6/5/2008: ANOTHER MATES DEAL ANNOUNCED
The Government have announced a sovereign risk deal that will pay Gunns $15m. if a future government interferes with wood supply to the pulp mill. The claim is that finance institutions asked for this. But did they? The ANZ have refused to confirm that they asked and it is a pathetically small amount compared with the cost of the mill at $2bn. $15m. would be just over a month's interest. It seems far more likely that the deal was made to discourage a future government from curtailing wood supply and that the announcement was made now because it would have to be disclosed in the budget coming up anyway. It's just another example of the Government bending over backwards to help Gunns. The mill has yet to be financed and is not likely to be this year (in spite of what Mr.Gay keeps saying) with the banks unlikely to give approval before all permits are granted (and then they might say no) - and the permit process seems to be taking three times as long as predicted.

4/5/2008: PRO-MILL CANDIDATE SUFFERS CRUSHING DEFEAT
In an upper house election in the electorate likely to be most affected by the pulp mill, Rosevears, the sitting member Kerry Finch, who is against a pulp mill in the Tamar valley, was re-elected with nearly 75% of the vote. The candidate against him supported the project so giving pro-millers a chance to have a say. The result shows that support for the mill is still only about 25% - that hasn't changed at all over the last three years.

2/5/2008: STATE GOVERNMENT REFUSE TO GIVE PIPELINE INFORMATION
Paul Lennon's transparency promise has taken another battering with the State Government refusing to release information on a possible secret pipeline financing deal between the State and Gunns. The pipeline is likely to cost well over $100m.

Matt Denholm

1/5/2008: COURT GIVES GO-AHEAD FOR CASE
Gunns' lawyers have failed in their attempt to stop 'Lawyers for Forests' challenging the Federal approval decision on environmental grounds. The case will be heard in June or July.

ABC

Australian

30/4/2008: PRO-DEMOCRACY MEETING ATTRACTS 700
A pro-democracy meeting held at Riverside last night attracted a large attendance. One of the main topics was the fast-track pulp mill approval process. Speakers included Warwick Raverty, Lindsay Tuffin, Bob McMahon, Terry Martin and Jeremy Rockliffe. The large very vocal audience made it quite clear that they are not happy with the present Government and the way it was supporting and promoting the pulp mill - and that this issue is not going to go away.

12/4/2008: TAP POLL NO COMFORT FOR GUNNS
An opinion poll commissioned by 'Tasmanians against the pulpmill' shows that the public are still very much opposed to the project. 61% said ANZ should not finance the mill (after eliminating don't knows) and only 1% thought spending money on infrastructure for the mill should come before health and education.

Mercury

6/4/2008: WHERE TO FROM HERE?
Gunns' CEO John Gay said this week that the banks will need to see all the permits in place before a decision on finance can be reached. At the present rate of progress that could be many months or even over a year away. And then the ANZ Bank could say NO. Meanwhile Gunns, which has only a modest operating profit, is bleeding from the costs of all the design work and permit preparations. If managed investment schemes are stopped and carbon credits introduced it may be that Gunns will be forced to have a re-think about the whole project.

4/4/2008: LAWYERS FOR FORESTS UPDATE
The first hearing in the case was on 4 February 2008. Gunns made an application for security for costs, which is an order that would require LFF to give a bank guarantee that would go to contribute to Gunns' legal costs if LFF lost the case. The Judge delayed deciding that application until a later stage in the proceeding. He said that at that stage he was of the view that LFF should not pay security for costs. Also on 4 February 2008, the Judge set a timetable - LFF is to file its evidence on 25 Februuary 2008, the Minister is to file his evidence on 17 March 2008 and all the parties will be back in Court on 18 March 2008 at which time it is possible that the Judge will set a date for the ultimate hearing of the case. The hearing scheduled for 18 March 2008 was changed to 30 April 2008.

Lawyers for Forests

2/4/2008: GARRETT GIVES GREEN LIGHT TO EARTHWORKS
Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett has given the go-ahead for earthworks to begin at the Longreach site. There has been no indication if Gunns will proceed - one problem might be that much of the rubble created will be used to build the wharf so that module may need to be passed first. Gunns have not confirmed finance yet and the ANZ have not given any indication at what point they will give a decision. If all permits need to be issued it could be a long long time.

Green light

28/03/2008: DESIGN WORK TO BE RELOCATED TO MELBOURNE
Gunns announced today that the design work for the mill, 100 jobs, is being relocated to Melbourne - the excuse being that more expertise was available there. So much for jobs for Tasmanians. Or could it be that Gunns do not want their design engineers exposed to public antagonism to the project?

25/03/2008: WORK ON THE SITE
Gunns have started installing their perimeter fence around the mill site. Rowella was treated to the sound of chainsaws as the fenceline was cleared.

25/03/2008: WHAT'S WRONG WITH TASSIE?
The Gunns' pulp mill has featured in a poll as the strongest negative about Tasmania in a visitor's poll.

Poll

21/03/2008: GAY DENIES MISLEADING PUBLIC
In an interview in the Hobart Mercury, Gunns' CEO John Gay says that more work will be done on the mill before it arrives which is why less workers are needed now. So the 3000 jobs and boost to the economy that would have resulted has been more than halved and the extra work is completed overseas. That wasn't in the promotional blurb. He is also said it would be built by the middle of 2010 (in spite of it taking longer to build) because the time started in January - in spite of no work on the site having started by Easter!

Gay interview

20/3/2008: LACK OF TRAINING MEANS FEW LOCAL PULP MILL JOBS
Industry analyst Robert Eastment says that little or no training has been done to prepare the Tasmanian workforce for work at the mill.

ABC

19/3/2008: YET ANOTHER LIE EXPOSED
It has now been announced that the number of jobs at the pulp mill site during construction will be less than 1300. The original documentation said 3000. How could they get this figure so completely wrong? Is it deception or ineptitude - or is there another explanation? The mill will take longer to build - another six months.

15/3/2008: LENNON FAILS TO ANSWER COLLUSION QUESTION
In an interview with Matthew Denholm, Premier Lennon refused to directly answer the question whether Gunns knew if they withdrew from the RPDC it would be replaced by a new easier approval process. The whole of Tasmania knows the answer to that question Mr Lennon, so why hide the truth?

Matthew Denholm

15/3/2008: LENNON ATTACKS 'NIMBY' ATTITUDE
Premier Paul Lennon admits that the people of Launceston don't want the pulp mill but says it is a 'Not in my backyard' response. Cobblers Mr Lennon. The people of Hobart voted 75% against the pulp mill in a council poll and the only poll where the mill had a (slight) majority was in George Town where it will be built. Think again Mr Lennon.

Australian

15/3/2008: HYDRO CANNOT GUARANTEE WATER FOR MILL
Hydro Tasmania admits it cannot guarantee water for the mill in drought conditions.

Mercury

14/3/2008: DEMO MARKS ANNIVERSARY OF RPDC DUMPING
A very vocal demonstration outside Gunns' offices in Launceston today indicated that opposition to the project is as strong as ever. The main speaker was former RPDC panellist Dr. Warwick Raverty.

Mercury

Dr. Warwick Raverty's speech

12/3/2008: FINANCE SET TO BE FINALISED - GAY
The front page of the Examiner quotes Gunns' CEO John Gay as saying that finance for the mill will be finalised soon. Could Mr. Gay be trying to prop up Gunns' falling share price? If there are no problems with the finance why say anything at all?

6/3/2008: PULP MILL WATER USAGE QUERIED
The pulp mill could use up to 45% of daily average flows at certain times according to the Mercury. There is also disquiet at how little Gunns are paying for their water - in fact, they are only paying for lost electricity generation.

Mercury

4/3/2008: GUNNS BEHIND SCHEDULE ON SUBMISSIONS
The Federal team assessing the mill are only working on one Gunns' submission - the earthworks. The others due by now are Wharf construction (14th Feb), Accommodation facility (1st Feb), and Pipeline (26th Feb). These dates were on Gunns' website.

4/3/2008: NEW APPROVAL MAY BE REQUIRED FOR PIPELINE
A legal opinion is that the pipeline would have to be sent back to Peter Garrett for further approval if sewage is added to the pulp mill effluent. The Tasmanian Liberals have come out against State funding for the pipeline.

Mercury

3/3/2008: PULP MILL UNREST BIGGER THAN FRANKLIN
Groups opposed to the proposed pulp mill promise a huge and bitter fight if the project proceeds.

Australian

3/3/2008: TASMANIAN GOVERNMENT MAY PAY FOR GUNNS' PIPELINE
In a move that makes it look as though Gunns is looking for financial help from the Tasmanian Government, Premier Paul Lennon has announced that the Government will look at declaring the pipeline essential infrastruture and pay the cost. This is likely to be far more than has been stated so they could get a shock. The reasons for doing so do not bear close scrutiny as there would be far cheaper options for irrigation and sewage disposal. In fact, the reason is that it would enable them to compulsory purchase a corridor for the pipeline as some landowners have said they will not let it through their land.

The Mercury

2/3/20008: GAY STILL GUNG-HO ON MILL
Gunns' CEO says that there will not be any problems with the mill going ahead and expects it to be operating by 2010. He admits that final approval for finance has not come through from the ANZ but says it is a formality.

The Mercury

1/3/2008: GAY SAYS PULP MILL PROJECT HAS MADE HIS LIFE A MISERY
In an interview with the Mercury newspaper, Gunns' CEO John Gay says that he can longer go out in public.

The Mercury

28/2/2008: GUNNS' PROFITS LOWER
Gunns announced a reduced half year profit of $14.9 million. Some broker recommendations have been downgraded.

23/02/2008: PULP MILL WILL NOT BE IMMUNE FROM GREENHOUSE SCRUTINY - LENNON
Tasmanian Premier Paul Lennon has asked Professor Ross Garnaut to assess the impact of the Tasmanian forestry industry on the greenhouse effect. He said that the recommendations will be implemented even if it adversly affects the pulp mill.

Australian

22/02/2008: GUNNS ARROGANT UNPROFESSIONAL COWBOYS - RAVERTY
Pulp and paper expert Dr Warwick Raverty says that Gunns have not received any recognisable support from other pulp and paper manufacturers in Australia probably because they could be afraid the Longreach project may give the industry a bad name with unacceptable odour emissions in the Tamar valley.

Tasmania Times

19/2/2008: STOP LOGGING FORESTS MEETING TOLD
An international forestry convention in Hobart has been told to stop logging old forests.

Mercury

16/2/2008: PULP MILL STILL UP IN THE AIR
A meeting of 290 contractors hoping for work on the pulp mill development has been told that the project still has to be voted on by the Gunns' Board and that finance had still not been finalised according to the Hobart Mercury.

12/2/2008: WE CAN FIELD 6,500 - WILDERNESS SOCIETY
Vica Bayley of the Tasmanian Wilderness Society says that they will protest for years if the mill is built.

Mercury

9/2/2008: PROTESTORS SHARPEN THEIR CLAWS
Preparations are being made to disrupt the building of the mill. Tasmanians against the pulpmill (TAP) are running training camps for peaceful protests.

Australian

8/2/2008: FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO BLAME FOR DELAYS - GAY
Gunns' CEO John Gay said that the timeline was out of date due to Federal Government delays in issuing permits and that no work would be carried out on the site until further permits were issued. He also said that the Gunns' Board would meet soon to approve the project which means they will have to disclose their source of funding to the Stock Exchange. There is also a rumour that Gunns are negotiating to sell their Tamar Ridge wine interests to Lion Nathan.

7/2/2008: GUNNS PROVIDES TIMELINE FOR MILL
Gunns have provided a time table for construction of their pulp mill at Longreach on their website. Gunns hope to start earthworks by the end of February and begin construction in August. It must be noted that Gunns have completely failed to meet any of their self-imposed deadlines in the past. Earthworks cannot begin until the Federal department passes further modules. Gunns have signed a contract with Poyry, the Swedish company that designed the mill, and have leased houses for their engineers so they obviously expect to be going ahead but, so far, there has been no confirmation of funding, a contract with the construction company or the Gunns' Board approving the project.

Gunns site

The timeline for the submissions and construction is on page 8 of the overview section. It is already behind schedule:

Overview - scroll to page 8

6/2/2008: CELCO EXECUTIVES TO BE QUESTIONED ABOUT TOXIC LEAK
The furore about the leak of toxic chemicals from the CELCO pulp mill that killed thousands of fish has involved executives of the company.

Santiago Times

5/2/2008: GEORGE TOWN ELECTOR POLL
In a Council elector poll in George Town, the place nearest where the pulp mill is supposed to built and where support for the proposal was considered to be strongest, nearly 50% of electors who voted opposed the mill. This has got to be a very disappointing result for supporters of the mill to get such a poor result in their heartland.

4/2/2008: LAWYERS FOR FORESTS TAKE GARRETT TO COURT
The group 'Lawyers for Forests' have started a legal battle against the Federal approval of the pulp mill on six counts. The case will be heard on March 18th.

1/2/2008: MINISTER APPROVES SITE CLEARANCE
In a statement released at 5.20pm on a Friday afternoon, Environment Minister Peter Garrett has approved the first two modules of the pulp mill plan. This means that Gunns can go ahead and clear the site. Another 14 modules will require the Minister's approval before further work can be done. The wisdom of allowing Gunns to clear the site before they have obtained the finance for the project has been questioned by environmentalists. The rumour is that ANZ are going to say NO and that the project is going to cost more than Gunns have budgeted for.

The Australian

29/1/2008: PULP MILL COULD COST TASMANIA $300 million
A new study has indicated that Gunns' figures on the financial benefits of the pulp mill are extremely optimistic and, in fact, the overall effect is more likely to be negative than positive.

$300m. cost

28/1/2008: FOREST INDUSTRY FUTURE BLEAK
A report in the Australian today says that, even with a pulp mill, competition from South America and Asia will mean low returns for Tasmanian forestry in the future.

The Australian

23/1/2008: DANNI ECUYER SAYS MILL NOT GOING TO HAPPEN
Former investment banker Danni Ecuyer says nobody is likely put money into the pulp mill in the present financial meltdown:

Danni Ecuyer

22/1/2008: OPPONENTS TAKE HEART FROM MORE MILL DELAYS
Further delays to the approval process and finance arrangements make it more and more likely that the pulp mill will never happen according to opponents:

Australian

18/1/2008: SO MUCH FOR TRANSPARENCY
The State Government has failed the transparency test again. A freedom of information request from the Greens on Gunns' construction permits has been refused. What possible reason can there be other than they're totally inadequate?

FOI refused

16/1/2008: IFT WINDING UP
The small group of businessmen and women called the 'Investors for the Future of Tasmania' (IFT) are calling it a day. The group tried unsuccessfully to stop the pulp mill in court. Mill supporters may think that this is a sign that opposition is abating but they would be wrong. The Greens, The Wilderness Society, Lawyers for Forests,Geoff Cousins and Tasmanians against the pulp mill (TAP) are all determined the mill will not proceed. And they will have plenty of time to campaign now that Gunns have admitted serious construction will not be for at least 6 months. It also looks increasingly improbable that Gunns will get the finance any time soon with the current credit crisis. Gunns' board has yet to approve the mill. If and when they do Gunns will have to disclose their loan arrangements to the stock exchange. If it gets to that point expect there to be a massive campaign against the lenders.

11/1/2008: GARRETT TO MAKE DECISION SOON
Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett will make a decision on a permit to allow Gunns to clear the pulp mill site at Longreach within a few days.

Decision soon

4/1/2008: GUNNS WAIT ON FEDERAL APPROVAL
Gunns intend to press for initial approval from the Federal Government next week to start work on their site. However, they admit, according to the Examiner, that construction will not start for 6 months. Gunns continues to issue statements that contradict what they have previously said. For example - any delays beyond 1st September would make the project unviable.

ABC report

3/1/2008: PULP MILL ON SHAKY GROUND
News on the pulp mill has been sparse over the Christmas period but opponents such as Geoff Cousins, Danni Ecuyer, TAP (Tasmanians against the pulp mill) and the Wilderness Society have vowed to continue the battle in 2008 with renewed vigour. A court challenge from Lawyers for Forests is due to start in a month. There have been rumours that the ANZ will not approve funding for the mill and/or that the chief scientist will reverse his approval in his next report due later this month. The financial situation is not looking good for Gunns with interest rates rising and credit getting increasingly hard to obtain. Also the price of oil is going through the roof and there is the threat of a recession in the United States and unrest/war in the Middle East. Another factor is the possible increase in construction costs if workplace reforms are abolished. A report has stated this could increase costs by as much as 7%. The Federal Government may take a dim view of Gunns' breach of conditions although it was only a minor breach by a firm checking out the local water table apparently.

21/12/2007: GUNNS BUYS LAND BUT PERMITS STILL TO BE GRANTED
Gunns has completed the purchase of the land at Longreach for the pulp mill from RIO TINTO but has yet to be granted a permit to clear the site nor has it yet signed contracts with the builder.

Mercury

20/12/2007: GEORGE TOWN COUNCIL HOLDS ELECTOR POLL
George Town Council are holding an elector poll on the pulp mill in the new year. It will cost $20,000 to conduct instead of the $5000 it would have cost if conducted at the time of the Council elections. Mill opponents say the Council is to blame as they ignored requests for an elector poll last year.

19/12/2007: HOBART COUNCIL WILL SEND RESULTS OF POLL TO CANBERRA
The Hobart City Council will send the results of their elector poll to Federal Ministers Penny Wong and Peter Garrett. The poll revealed that over 75% of voters were opposed to the mill proposal and the way it was approved.

Mercury

18/12/2007: ANZ AGM BRIEFED ON MILL
The Wilderness Society briefed the ANZ AGM on the mill today at the invitation of the ANZ CEO Mike Smith. The ANZ chairman said that the bank had yet to decide on whether to finance the mill. The Wilderness Society said that they could not approve the mill without breaking the Equator Principles which the bank has signed.

Tasmanian Times

18/12/2007: CANADIAN PULP MILL FAILS TO MAKE PROFIT - CLOSED
The closure of a Canadian pulp mill was announced yesterday. It cannot make a profit because of the high value of the Canadian dollar. The Australian dollar has been gaining on the American dollar in recent months.

Kymmene Pulp and Paper mill

15/12/2007: ANZ MAY SAY NO
There are rumours that the ANZ Bank will not finance the mill according to Crikey.com. This would mean Gunns would have to look elsewhere for finance and it could mean higher interest payments and more risk.

14/12/2007: WILDERNESS SOCIETY DROP COURT CASE
The Wilderness Society have decided not to appeal against the decision that supported the EPBC assessment.

14/12/2007: GUNNS ON SHORT-LIST TO TAKE OVER CARTER HOLT
According to the Australian today, Gunns are on the most favoured list to buy the New Zealand timber company Carter Holt. This company is worth more than Gunns so it is likely that there would have to a substantial capital raising - perhaps in the form of a rights issue.

12/12/2007: GUNNS HAVE NOT HAD QUOTE FROM LEIGHTON YET
Gunns may be in for a shock when they get the quote from Leightons to build the mill:

Michael West

10/12/2007: GUNNS MAY HAVE BREACHED CONDITIONS
A report today says that work on the pulp mill site may have breached the planning Ministers' conditions. Section 20 (a) of the approval document says 'No disturbance must occur until such a time as the relevant pre-construction and construction requirements of the EIMP have been approved by the Minister'.

Mercury

8/12/2007: SHAREHOLDERS QUESTION ECONOMICS OF MILL
A blogspot has questioned whether building the mill is a sensible economic decision and complains that Gunns Ltd AGM was halted before this could be discussed by shareholders.

Investor information service

5/12/2007: LAWYERS FOR FORESTS CHALLENGE MILL APPROVAL
A legal challenge to the pulp mill approval decision will be submitted in Court today based on the premise that Malcolm Turnbull had insufficient information to approve the project because the marine effluent survey and modelling had not been completed. It will be heard on February 4th.

Australian

29/11/2007: PETER GARRETT APPOINTED ENVIRONMENT MINISTER
In a move that will please conservationists, PM elect Kevin Rudd has appointed Peter Garrett as Minister for the Environment.

29/11/2007: RAVERTY TELLS GEORGE TOWN - IT'S GOING TO SMELL
In a submission to the George Town Council for their public meeting, pulp and paper expert Dr. Warwick Raverty warns the residents of George Town to expect the pulp mill to smell.

Raverty

28/11/2007: GEORGE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING REJECTS MILL
At a public meeting in George Town last night, a motion that called on the Council to withdraw its support for the pulp mill was passed as well as one that called on the council to undertake a health and safety risk assessment of the project.

ABC

27/11/2007: GUNNS BIDS FOR AUSPINE AND SUSPENDS SHARES
Gunns Ltd has offered $7 a share to purchase the 39% of Auspine that it does not own. Meanwhile, shares in Gunns Ltd were suspended at the company's request pending an announcement on Thursday. We can only guess at the subject of the pending announcement but it must be pretty major to suspend the shares. Are they about to pull the plug on the mill? - Or perhaps they are going to bid for Carter-Holt, the New Zealand timber company that is for sale and that would fit very nicely on to Gunns' existing business. It could just be to stabilise the shares until the Auspine deal is complete.

27/11/2007: RAVERTY SAYS MILL WAS ELECTION ISSUE
Former RPDC panel member Warwick Raverty says that the swing from the Liberals to the Greens was at least partially caused by the pulp mill issue.

Typingisnotactivism

26/11/2007: ELECTION RESULT HITS GUNNS' SHARES
Gunns' shares fell sharply today as investors realised that the Green party would have the balance of power in the Senate and could us this to impede the pulp mill. Greens' leader Bob Brown has called on the new Government to review the pulp mill decision.

25/11/2007: ELECTION RESULTS REFLECT PULP MILL UNEASE
A huge increase in the Green vote across Tasmania shows that the opposition to the pulp mill had quite an effect. Senator Bob Brown was elected with a full quota and it is possible that the second Greens candidate, Andrew Wilkie, will be elected on preferences. The pulp mill backlash has almost certainly cost both Liberal sitting members in the lower house their seats. The man who insisted that Malcolm Turnbull approved the mill, John Howard, has gone. If he loses his seat by a small margin, it may well be that the pulp mill issue sunk him too. Malcolm Turnbull, who is against the mill according to Geoffrey Cousins, was re-elected and may be a candidate to be leader of the opposition.

Sue Neales

24/11/2007: ISSUE GETS AIRING IN BRITISH PRESS
The pulp mill issue is featured strongly in this article in one of Britain's quality daily newspapers.

The Guardian

Many thanks to the person who sent this cartoon:

23/11/2007: BOTNIA STARTS UP - WHAT A PONG!
The newest pulp mill in the World featuring state of the art technology has opened up in Uruguay. There are reports of revolting smells and people ill with nausea and vomiting. Here is a transalation of the report:

Transalation

23/11/2007: THE MOST EXTRAORDINARY AGM
Crikey.com's Stephen Mayne said that the Gunns' AGM was the most extraordinary he had ever been to.

Stephen Mayne

There were threats and scuffles:

ABC report

22/11/2007: COURT REJECTS WILDERNESS SOCIETY APPEAL
The High Court today rejected the Wilderness Society appeal against Malcolm Turnbull's assessment of the mill.

22/11/2007: GUNNS AGM DISSOLVES INTO CHAOS
In Launceston today, at Gunns' AGM, Gunns' CEO John Gay announced a reduced yearly profit of $75m. He said that he was confident that the proposed pulp mill will be competitive and profitable. The meeting broke up in choas as Anti-pulp mill shareholders asked Gay difficult questions and the CEO stopped the AGM without finishing the agenda.

Mercury report

21/11/2007: FLANNERY SAYS MILL UNLIKELY
Australian of the year, Professor Tim Flannery, says that Gunns will be lucky to find anyone to finance the mill:

Flannery

20/11/2007: FLANAGAN SAYS MILL MUST BE STOPPED
Author Richard Flanagan said in his speech to 15,000 at the Hobart rally that the mill must be stopped for Tasmania's sake:

Flanagan

20/11/2007: ANZ WILL LOSE HUNDREDS OF ACCOUNTS
The Wilderness Society picketted ANZ Banks today and predicted that ANZ would lose hundreds if not thousands of accounts it it financed the mill:

Mercury

19/11/2007: LAUNCESTON COUNCIL WITHDRAWS SUPPORT FROM PROJECT
Launceston City Council withdrew its support for the pulp mill project this afternoon in a vote by 7 votes to 5 reflecting the change in numbers after the Council elections.

ABC

18/11/2007: NOTHING IS GOING RIGHT FOR GUNNS
The Age reports that financial markets are getting worried about Gunns' pulp mill project.

The Age

17/11/2007: PULP THE MILL - WE CAN, WE WILL!
15,000 people demonstrated in the rain against the mill in Hobart today chanting "Pulp the mill - We can, we will". There were speeches by Bob McMahon, Naomi Edwards, Geoffrey Cousins and Richard Flanagan. Traffic had to be halted as thousands marched through the streets after a rally in Franklin Square.

Hobart Rally

The Wilderness Society are targeting financiers involved with the project:

It's not over yet

13/11/2007: ETHICAL CORPORATION QUESTIONS MILL FINANCE
The magazine 'Ethical Corporation' reports that institutional investors are unhappy with Gunns' pulp mill project.

Gunning for Gunns

13/11/2007: TAP ANNOUNCE HUGE CLASS ACTION IF MILL PROCEEDS
Tasmanians against the pulp mill (TAP) say that they will organism the largest legal class action that Australia has ever seen if the mill is built encompassing issues like falling house prices, lost business for tourist ventures and prime producers and health problems.

The Mercury

13/11/2007: NATIONWIDE POLL AGAINST MILL
A nationwide poll says that 52% of Australians think there should be an inquiry in to how the pulp mill was approved. Nearly twice as many are against the mill as for it.

12/11/2007: POLL SHOWS 54% DON'T WANT MILL
A Wilderness Society poll has found that 54% of Tasmanians do not want the pulp mill with 37% saying they do and the rest with no opinion. Pressure is building on the ANZ bank not to finance the mill. The bank already has links with a company in Papua New Guinea that has been accused of illegal logging.

Pressure on ANZ

12/11/2007: ARGENTINA ANGRY ABOUT MILL IN URUGUAY
A blockade continues on a bridge near a huge pulp mill in Uruguay about to start operations.

BBC report

11/11/2007: MILL BIG ISSUE IN WENTWORTH
The pulp mill could make the difference in Malcolm Turnbull's seat of Wentworth as polls show the two main candidates running neck and neck.

Wentworth

11/11/2007: COMMENT - WILL THE MILL SLOWLY SINK?
In spite of Gunns' brave statements that there are no problems and that construction will begin before the end of the year (which is impossible under the terms of Turnbull's permits), it looks as though there are many problems for Gunns to overcome. The mill only has a conditional approval, construction cannot begin without the next stage of approval which requires quite a lot of work to be done, and final approval to operate will only be given when Gunns have completed a complicated survey/modelling of Bass Strait which will take over a year. This work must show that the effluent is dispersed efficiently and yet two definitive surveys, one by the CSIRO and one by Paul Sandery of Flinders University (who produce all the tide tables), both show that the area into which the effluent is going only flushes by 1% a day. Any schoolboy will tell you that the maximum concentration of pollutants will be reached after 100 days yet Gunns' IIS says that it will be 30 days (which would require 3.3% flushing a day). The IIS acknowledges the Sandery survey but says the reason for the difference is that Bass Strait is a very large body of water - not exactly a scientific explanation. So how is a new survey going to prove efficient dispersal? The results of Gunns' survey will be checked by the panel of top scientists. If Gunns build the mill but cannot get approval to operate then a further level of effluent control will have to be built on at vast expense and potentially fatal delays. Who would lend a huge amount of money to a company in these circumstances? If they're wise, they will insist on the survey being completed and passed first.

As well as that, there are reports that the new permit conditions have increased the cost of the project perhaps beyond Gunns' ability to raise funds or beyond the point where it is economic. This could be the reason why Wal King of Leighton Holdings said it would a long, long time before it was built, if ever. The other reason could be shortage of skilled labour. Many of the workers will be working on other projects which will have to be completed before they can join the project.

Political uncertainties also surround the project with the election likely to result in the Greens having the balance of power in the Senate. Could Green demands that the pulp mill be stopped before vital Government legislation is passed derail the project? And, if as seems likely Labor get in, will the MIS schemes that plantations rely on be stopped? Or will Gunns go ahead when they AWAs are abolished? Interest rates are rising, World credit supplies are drying up, the oil price is going through the roof and the Australian dollar is high reducing Gunns' profits on woodchip exports. Another possibility is that a new Labor Government will legislate to force the mill to use plantation wood making it less economic.

Finally, there is international tension in the Middle East. Another conflict could see an oil blockade, huge increases in the oil price and a financial downturn. If the price of wood pulp falls the financial backers of the project might pull out.

8/11/2007: WILL THE MILL EVER BE BUILT?
At the Leighton AGM, boss Wal King says that it will be a long time before the Gunns' pulp mill will be built - if it ever is.

A long time

8/11/2007: STUDENTS DEMONSTRATE IN LAUNCESTON
About 350 students demonstrated peacefully in Launceston today against the pulp mill.

ABC

8/11/2007: TASMANIA'S PLANNING SYSTEM GETS A 'D'
Tasmania's planning system has been awarded a lowly 'D' partially because of the botched pulp mill assessment process. The planning institute of Australia has little confidence in the process.

ABC

8/11/2007: GREEN SUPPORT IN TASMANIA CLIMBS
The latest poll shows Green support in Tasmania has soared and, as most Green preferences go to Labor, the Liberals are likely to lose Bass and Braddon. The poll also shows Bob Brown will win a full quota for the first time in the Senate.

EMRS poll

6/11/2007: The Australian has printed the story:

The Australian

5/11/07: TURNBULL SAID HE HATED THE MILL
According to garden guru Peter Cundall, Malcolm Turnbull said that he hated the mill and the Tamar valley was a stupid place to put it. In reply Mr.Turnbull said that he only said he hated the State Government process but Peter Cundall says that is incorrect and that there are plenty of witnesses. So why did Turnbull approve the mill, albeit with much tougher conditions? The only answer is that it was forced on him by senior Liberals who thought they would lose votes in northern Tasmania (by now they must be thinking again!) if they rejected it. Either that, or because John Howard is friends with John Gay. Either way, it is hardly a good reason to approve a project that has the potential to affect so many lives and businesses.

And he said to me....

In another 'off the record' interview, opposition environment spokesman Peter Garratt said that their policies in power could be different from what they said in opposition and this included the pulp mill.

and I said to him....

2/11/2007: GOVERNMENT THREATENS STUDENTS
As with any action now against the pulp mill, the Police are considering charging organizers of a student anti-pulp mill rally in Hobart yesterday. It seems the State Government are intent on getting their message across that no interference with their beloved pulp mill project will be tolerated. There will be another rally next week in Launceston:

Students march

1/11/2007: TAP CLAIMS VICTORY IN LOCAL POLLS
Tasmanians against the pulp mill (TAP) are claiming a victory for their 'Voters' Block' in the local council elections. In Launceston Pro-pulp mill Mayor Ivan Dean and his deputy were dumped and Jeremy Ball (Green) was easily voted on as well as a TAP member Ian Norton. There is now an anti-mill majority on the Launceston City Council. In the West Tamar, two TAP members were elected and an anti-mill deputy major. Even in George Town 55% voted for the anti-mill mayor candidates although existing mayor Doug Burt just scraped in on preferences. Another Voters' Block endorsed candidate was voted on to the council.

Australian

PERPETUAL'S ETHICAL FUND AVOIDS GUNNS
Gunns' largest shareholder Perpetual has an ethical fund which avoids Gunns' shares. Perpetual have taken the unusual step of discussing their holding in Gunns at a board meeting because of investor disquiet.

Perpetual wary

31/10/2007: PRO-PULP MILL MAYOR, IVAN DEAN, DUMPED BY ELECTORATE
In what must be seen as a win for Tasmanians against the pulp mill's voters' block, the mayor of Launceston, Ivan Dean, was voted out of office. The major of George Town came close to being booted out as well and Green candidates have scored dramatic victories. The full results will be known later today.

30/10/2007: HOBART POLL SHOWS HUGE OPPOSITION TO PULP MILL
The elector poll in the Hobart local elections shows that over 75% are against the process used to approve the pulp mill and over 76% are against it being sited in the Tamar valley!

30/10/2007: DANI ECUYER CUT OFF AT PERPETUAL MEETING
Anti-pulp mill protesters caused quite a stir in Sydney today at the AGM of Perpetual Ltd which holds a large stake in Gunns Ltd. Several protesters were ejected from the hotel for handing out leaflets.

Sydney Morning Herald

ABC

29/10/2007: THE TRUTH COMES OUT - DIOXIN LIMITS WERE DECIDED BY GUNNS!
Chief Scientist Jim Peacock now admits that Dioxin levels allowed in Gunns' effluent will be a lot higher than mills in Sweden and Canada and that the levels allowed were actually suggested by Gunns. Far from being four times more stringent as Turnbull claimed, in fact they were more than three times the level of similar mills in Canada and Sweden. The lies just keep coming:

Dioxin levels

28/10/2007: EFFECT OF MILL ON WILDLIFE NOT CONSIDERED
In a far-reaching article in the Australian, Matthew Denholm says that whilst measures have been taken to prevent loss of species around the construction and effluent sites, absolutely nothing has been done in the assessment process to consider whether the huge amount of logging will impact on protected species:

Chip off the old blockade

26/10/2007: ABETZ ISSUES MILL PROPAGANDA
The Federal Minister for forestry has issued a list of answers for Federal Liberal candidates when they are asked about Gunns' pulp mill. It contains the usual answers including how much of Tasmania is reserved (and so it should be). It does not say that a large percentage of farmland will be bought for plantations so increasing Australia's imports of food and ruining Tasmania's beautiful landscape - a mix of farmland and forests. No tourists will pay to come and see trees planted in neat rows:

Sydney Morning Herald

25/10/2007: RPDC CHIEF SAYS FULL ASSESSMENT OF THE MILL WAS NECESSARY
Responding to statements from Gunns and Paul Lennon that the RPDC assessment of the proposed mill was too long, RPDC chief Simon Cooper described the criticism as ill-informed and said that the public should have been able to have their say at public hearings.

Mercury report

24/10/2007: MILL FAILS GREEN POWER TEST
The Green revealed today that the power produced by the pulp mill will not receive green creditation because it will burn old-growth forest. This could affect the ability to raise funds for the mill. Also revealed today was the profit figures for Forestry Tasmania which showed that taxpayers received zero dividends for all the forestry assets in the state whilst Gunns made $88m. profit.

23/10/2007 :MILL CONSTRUCTION WILL START IN JANUARY - GAY
John Gay said today that he expected the construction of the mill to begin in January. Mr. Gay has made statements like this in the past and been wrong and it looks a little optimistic. In fact, Mr.Gay's comment might be aimed at possible investors rather than the public as it also says that Gunns had no problems with Mr.Turnbull's 48 extra conditions. Road works at the entrance of the Longreach site will be started soon but these are road improvements only.

22/10/2007: NEW STUDY SHOWS DIOXINS PRODUCE MORE GIRLS
A new Canadian study shows that populations exposed to dioxins from heavy industry produce more girls. Effluent has also been known to skew the gender balance in the seas around the outfall (see effluent section).

Dioxin report

20/10/2007: FISHERMEN KNOCK BACK CELCO - 'SEAS NOT FOR SALE'
Fishermen near the Celco pulp mill at Valdivia have refused compensation payments which would allow Celco to dump effluent in to the sea where they fish. The company was told it can no longer dump effluent in the Cruces river because it caused an environmental catastrophe and is now trying to build a pipeline to the ocean. This is an interesting story:

Santiago Times

20/10/2007: BUSH FIRE SHOWS HOW POLLUTION WILL STAY IN VALLEY
This morning Tamar valley residents awoke on a windless, cloudless day to find that a relatively small bushfire along the East Tamar Highway had filled up the valley with smoke demonstrating once again that any pollution released in the valley is trapped by an inversion layer.

20/10/2007: WOOD SUPPLY FIGURES RELEASED - INFLATION FROZEN AT LESS THAN 2% FOR GUNNS
The agreement between Forestry Tasmania and Gunns Ltd has finally been released (after all the political decisions have been made!). The price will depend on World pulp prices with the lowest that Gunns will pay being $12.50 a tonne for native forest and $27 a tonne for plantation. There is no timeline for Gunns to switch from native forest to plantation. Plantation wood produces at least 10% more pulp but, when pulp prices are low, will cost more than twice as much. So guess which source Gunns will be using. Increases for inflation look modest too with no increase at all for 5 years in the lowest price then a 12% increase - that's less than 2% compound per year. The present level of inflation is 3% and, if that continues, Gunns will be paying over 20% less in real terms in 20 years.

19/10/2007: PULP MILL DECISION BITES BACK
The Liberals have halved the ALP opinion poll lead nationally in the last few days but there is a glaring exception, Bass, where the pulp mill is due to be built. In Bass, a survey found that one in four voters was less likely to vote Liberal because of the pulp mill approval:

The Australian

19/10/2007: DANIELLE ECUYER COMES OUT FIGHTING
Women For Change Alliance (WFCA) founder Danielle Ecuyer describes her recent trip to Tasmania in the latest WFCA newsletter. Ms.Ecuyer describes Tasmania as a sophisticated World-class tourist destination:

WFCA newsletter

18/10/2007: COURT CASE TO LAST THREE DAYS
It is thought that the appeal against the original decision of the High Court to dismiss the Wilderness Society's case against Malcolm Turnbull will last three days and finish on Friday. The judgment is not expected for some weeks.

17/10/2007: PROTESTORS EXPOSE GOVERNMENT SHAME
A band of three protestors have exposed just how touchy (ashamed?) the State Government is about the pulp mill. They were on top of the Batman Bridge 90 metres up for two days before anyone noticed. No traffic was held up. The routine maintenance work on the bridge carried on as usual. Now, desperate to avoid too much publicity, the authorities are pulling out all the stops to get them down even though they say they will come down on Friday by themselves.

The Batman Bridge is just south of the pulp mill site on the Tamar estuary

The top is 90 metres high. It can be seen for miles. The pulp mill will be 190m. above the water.

A rather over the top reaction involving 12 vehicles

An embarrasing banner for the State Government

The story has made The Australian

EUROPEAN PERCEPTION OF AUSTRALIA - THE STUPID COUNTRY
This article in The Age says that Australia does not take advantage of its natural resources and includes the pulp mill proposal as an example of stuffing up our future for the sake of a few extra dollars now:

The stupid country

Are we stupid? This picture was taken from the Batman Bridge immediately below today's protest. How do you stuff up a beautiful place like this? Easy, you build a 3km. long, 190m. high pulp mill just round the corner!

15/10/2007: NO SAFE LEVEL OF DIOXIN
Gunns' proposed pulp mill will produce as much dioxin as the whole of the Swedish industry combined and that the level being allowed was surprising as there was no safe level for dioxins according to an article in The Age:

The Age

14/10/2007: ADVISOR SAYS MILL APPROVAL CRAZY
Science advisor Dr. Thomas Moore said today at the Bondi Beach meeting that it was unbelievable that the mill could be approved before the science had been done and that Gunns' very existence could be put at risk:

13/10/2007: DANIELLE ECUYER STANDS IN WENTWORTH
Filled with passion after her visit to the Tamar valley and north-eastern logging coupes, Ms. Ecuyer has decided to stand for parliament:

Ecuyer stands

12/10/2007: TURNBULL APPOINTS EXPERTS
Malcolm Turnbull has appointed a panel of experts to make sure that Gunns complies with the conditions laid down in Jim Peacock's report. These experts will be able to ensure compliance unlike the pathetic permits laid down by the Tasmanian government:

The expert committee

FORESTRY TOUR LEAVES PARTICIPANTS 'GOBSMACKED'
Yesterday, a tour of an area being logged organised by Tasmanians against the pulp mill (TAP), which included anti-pulp mill campaigner Danielle Ecuyer, returned amazed by what they had seen. Some were reduced to tears by the destruction of the pristine forest areas with trees several hundred years old amongst those logged (so much for no old growth logging).

11/10/2007: MILL OPPONENTS TACKLE NEWHOUSE
George Newhouse, Malcolm Turnbull's Labor opponent in Wentworth, is now being targeted by anti-mill activists:

Australian

MILL SAGA MAY RESULT IN FORESTRY RE-THINK
Judith Ajana writes in 'The Age' that Gunns will have to use native forest for its pulp mill to compete with South America and that the furore created by this proposal may force the major political parties into a re-think on forestry policies:

Judith Ajani

10/10/2007: MILL PROPOSAL DOES NOT ADD UP - BUSINESS AUSTRALIAN
John Durie in the Business Backpage of the Australian says that this project is literally a bet-the-company proposition with interest bills outweighing Gunns' earnings, production costs nearly double those in Brazil and investment scheme owners getting very poor returns. These figures were supplied by a consultant who cannot work out how the mill will pay its way.

John Durie

9/10/2007: BOTH PEACOCK AND TURNBULL WARN GUNNS
Federal environment minister and chief scientist have both warned Gunns that it cannot start construction until 3 months of data is collected and if their effluent modelling proves to be inadequate or shows that pollutants will accumulate then the mill will not be allowed to operate and that to start construction of the mill before the effluent studies are completed constitutes a risk.

Turnbull

Peacock

BEN QUIN STANDS
Ben Quin, who resigned as Lyons Liberal candidate, is standing as an independent. The Greens say they will direct preferences his way. Ben was interviewed by Kerry O'Brien on the 7.30 report and came over very well:

Ben Quin on 7.30 report - transcript

Once again, the Business Australian today advises investors to AVOID Gunns' shares.

8/10/2007: FINANCE NOT A PROBLEM SAYS GUNNS
Gunns say that it does not matter if the banks do not approve their funding. Of course it matters as Gunns would be forced to borrow overseas at greater cost and with the dangers of currency movements. In fact, Gunns do not usually comment on campaigns against them so it is likely that they ARE worried about finance and that they are trying to stop ANZ being targeted.

Robin Gray says mill will be built

7/10/2007: APPROVAL DECISION IGNITES COMMUNITY ANGER
If the politicians thought that the 'final' decision on the mill would signal an end to the matter, they've been quickly disappointed. A huge rally was held today at Low Head. Thousands of angry Tamar valley residents gave Bob Brown a standing ovation and heard him say that the decision was open to legal challenge.

Wotif boss Braeme Wood is furious that the assessment did not take into account loss of tourism:

Wotif boss is angry

Environmental websites all over the World have latched on to the story:

Environment news

Local groups such as Tasmanians Against the Pulpmill (TAP) and the Wilderness Society are preparing for battle:

Voters' Block

ANZ Bank may find it hard to approve finance with such vocal opposition:

Finance and the ANZ Bank

6/10/2007: LIBERAL CANDIDATE QUITS
Lyons Liberal candidate Ben Quin has quit the Liberal party in disgust at the pulp mill approval.

Quin quits

LENNON'S HYPOCRISY REACHES NEW HEIGHTS
Tasmanian Premier Paul Lennon now says that he wants to heal the divisions in Tasmanian society caused by the pulp mill dispute. But first he gave a triumphal speech guaranteed to annoy anyone who has witnessed the way that he has lied and cheated to try and get his own way. In any other state in Australia Lennon would be history by now and in disgrace. It speaks volumes about the quality of our parliamentary representatives that he is still there after misleading parliament and the people. The Federal assessment over a small section of the mill's possible environmental footprint found dozens of concerns. How many would have been found if the whole project had been assessed? The State assessment did not even look at possible health effects and fugitive odour emissions - the area of largest concern to residents and businesses.

Sue Neales in the Mercury

CHIEF SCIENTIST'S REPORT
Section 2.1.1.6 states quite clearly that 3 months of roadkill data must be collected and analysed before construction can commence. Presumably this will not begin until Gunns' board give the go-ahead. John Gay is sadly misinformed if he thinks construction can start this year. With the long Summer break, the end of January would seem a more optimistic date to aim for.

5/10/2007: ANZ HAVE NOT DECIDED ABOUT MILL FINANCE YET
Gunns' bankers, the ANZ, have not decided yet if they will finance the mill. They have commissioned reports on the project. Businessman Geoffrey Cousins is trying to persuade them to refuse finance.

ANZ and the mill

COMMENT: Malcolm Turnbull has hidden behind a scientific report and obviously cares more about his own political future more than the residents of the Tamar valley who may have to put up with the dreadful odour of this mill on and off for the next 50 years. One thing is now certain - The Liberals will lose Bass and Braddon in the coming election and Mr. Turnbull will probably be booted out from Wentworth where there is anger at his decision. He had the power to stop it, he knew it was an inadequate state assessment but he did nothing. Reports from around Australia indicate that there is absolute outrage that this project has been given the green light and there will be a backlash.

4/10/2007 MILL APPROVED BUT 24 MORE STRICT CONDITIONS.
Some of the conditions will have to be satisfied before construction can begin, some before the mill can start up. Gunns will have to draw up an environmental impact management plan (EIMP) in co-operation with the scientific committee. Some parts of this will have to be completed and passed by the minister before construction can begin. Unlike the rather pathetic permits drawn up by the state government, there are provisions to shut down the mill if trigger limits are exceeded. Monitoring will be more extensive and strict and will be controlled by the Commonwealth department. There will be Commonwealth site inspectors during construction. The levels of dioxins and furans will be one quarter of current World's best practice with trigger limits one sixth. These are very tough guidelines indeed and Gunns may find it hard to operate within them. But Gunns CEO John Gay says that he will press on with the mill but he thinks the guidelines are unfair. It remains to be seen whether the threat of legal action from Geoffrey Cousins and the Greens will eventuate.

The conditions

The chief scientist's report

Summary of chief scientist's report

3/10/2007: DECISION WILL BE ANNOUNCED TOMORROW
Federal environment minister Turnbull says the pulp mill decision will be announced tomorrow.

3/10/2007: NEW POLL SUGGESTS LIBERALS COULD WIN BASS - IF THEY SAY NO TO THE MILL
An opinion poll released today says that a large percentage of voters could change their vote over the pulp mill issue and it might be the only way that the Liberals can hold Bass:

Opinion poll

HERBICIDE STUFF-UP WORST POSSIBLE TIMING FOR GUNNS
A serious herbicide leak has occurred in Western Creek from one of Gunns' plantations. Local pasture, an irrigation dam and possibly rivers supplying Deloraine, Westbury and the West Tamar could have been affected. The incident took place a couple of months ago and it taken a while for the news to leak out. Environmentalists are asking if Gunns cannot be trusted on a simple matter such as this to take all possible precautions and immediately inform the authorities if an accident occurs then how can it be trusted to run a large chemical factory?

Australian

2/10/2007: CONFUSION AS RUMOURS AND CONFLICTING STATEMENTS ABOUND
The approval situation has become very confused. Gunns Ltd said they had not seen the scientist's report the same day that the Environment department said they had consulted them. Geoffrey Cousins claims that the report should have been made public if Gunns has seen it. Gunns have not yet made any submission in reply to the report. Gunns' CEO John Gay said yesterday that if there were any more conditions and stricter controls then the project would have to be abandoned (had nobody told him?). Today, he said that the manufacturers of the equipment would have to indicate that they could come in under the required new limits or finance for the project would not be available. A legal opinion obtained by the Greens has confirmed that the EPBC Act does not allow for conditional approvals.

Threat to axe project

Gunns handed report

ABC - additional information required

1/10/2007: TURNBULL ADMITS DECISION MAY GO TO COURT
Malcolm Turnbull has said he will make a decision this week and release the report at the time. He admits the decision could be challenged in court but is confident that the decision will be upheld:

The Mercury

Cousins keeps up the pressure

Bloomberg is in on the act

The conservation vessel, 'Sea Shepherd', sailed in the Tamar this afternoon according to an observer at Beauty Point. It is not known if this is connected in any way with the pulp mill proposal but if an organization like Greenpeace became involved in protest action would create a nightmare for Gunns as access to the site from the river could be blocked and protesting activists could invade the area from the river bank.

30/9/2007: TURNBULL WILL FOLLOW SCIENTISTS ADVICE
Federal environment minister Malcolm Turnbull said this morning on Win TV's Sunday programme that he would be following the advice of the chief scientist, Jim Peacock, to the letter. He said there was no point in asking top experts for advice and then ignoring it.

An interesting article in 'Pulp and paper' by Chris Lang:

Pulp and paper

29/9/2007: TURNBULL CANNOT MAKE MILL DECISION CONDITIONAL
According to a legal opinion obtained by Geoffrey Cousins, Malcolm Turnbull cannot make a decision to approve the mill conditionally under the EPBC Act as it states that the minister must know the full effects of the proposal before approval is given. So, presumably this means that any extra modeling must be done and approved before permission can be given. This would mean that Gunns would have to complete more extensive and expensive work on the effluent discharge before getting permission to go ahead (and that's if the work is satisfactory and shows no ill effects). Gunns' share price is still in full retreat in a rising market.

The Australian

GREEN CANDIDATES TOUR TAMAR VALLEY
The Green election candidates from Wentworth and Kingsford-Smith (Turnbull and Garratt's constituencies) are touring the Tamar valley to see for themselves where the proposed pulp mill will be.

The ABC

28/9/2007: CONDITIONS MAY MAKE MILL UNECONOMIC
If Malcolm Turnbull approves the mill but puts strict conditions such as making the effluent pipe go much further out to sea, insisting on further modeling before approval is given and/or requiring an upgraded treatment plant then the project is likely to be unviable says Matthew Denholm in the Australian:

The Australian

Gunns' share price is falling in an otherwise rising market which suggests all is not well with the proposal.

28/9/2007: LENNON CALLS FOR DECISION
Tasmanian Premier yesterday called for the decision (ie approval) to be made straight away to avoid the possibility of an election delaying the decision:

Mercury report

However, Eric Abetz has told Lennon to pipe down and that it was his ham fisted approach that nearly got the mill sunk:

ABC

27/9/2007: FEDERAL CABINET REFUSED TO MAKE DECISION ON MILL
The report from the chief scientist says that the pulp mill proposal is seriously flawed and should only be approved if far more stringent controls are introduced according to the Mercury today. Federal cabinet has been briefed but refused to make a decision with Prime Minister John Howard in favour of an approval:

Mercury report

COMMENT: If the scientist's report said that the pulp mill was ok then there would be no reason to delay the decision and it would have been announced. So, there are obviously problems and the delay can only be because the minister is deciding exactly what Gunns will have to do to get the go-ahead. The report will be mainly concerned with the effluent and one possibility is that Gunns will be forced to prove without any doubt that the effluent will be dispersed efficiently before they can start building. This would result in a significant delay and further substantial costs for Gunns without any guarantee of approval as the work will be checked by independent scientists - not the cosy Scandinavian set-up that was used by the state government.

26/9/2007: SCIENTIST'S REPORT WILL IMPOSE RIGOROUS CONDITIONS
According to 'The Age', the chief scientists report will impose more stringent conditions on Gunns if the pulp mill is to go ahead:

The Age

24/9/2007: TURNBULL SAYS HE WILL FOLLOW SCIENTISTS ADVICE
Federal environment minister Malcolm Turnbull has said that he will follow the advice given in the chief scientists report closely but that it will take about a week to announce his recommendations. He is going to Washington tomorrow for a few days and will not be back until Sunday. Paul Lennon says he should decide (ie approve it) immediately:

ABC report

23/9/2007: HUNDREDS ATTEND HILLWOOD MEETING
A meeting at Hillwood, in the George Town council area and Bass constituency, attracted hundreds of residents nearly all of whom were opposed to the mill and wanted the council to hold a referendum. Hillwood Hall - standing room only:

A song was written by Tasmanian singer, Jim Welsh, for the event:

Beautiful valley 4.8mb (broadband only!)

22/9/2007: REPORT DUE ON MONDAY
The report on the pulp mill from chief scientist Jim Peacock will be handed to Malcolm Turnbull on Monday and Liberals are urging Mr.Turnbull to approve the project straight away if the report is favourable. The Liberals seem to think that approving the mill will improve their chances of winning Bass. In fact, the opposite is almost certainly true with a massive voters' block organised by TAP (Tasmanians against the pulpmill) pledged to vote against the candidates supporting the mill. Meanwhile, an online submission is being organised to persuade the ANZ Bank not to lend the money for the mill.

Mercury

The Australian

22/9/2007: GUNNS LOOKING AT CARTER HOLT
Gunns are looking to expand abroad and have their eyes on Carter Holt, a large timber-based company in New Zealand that would tie in nicely with their purchase of a controlling interest in Auspine.

ABC

21/9/2007: VIABILITY OF PULP MILL QUESTIONED UNLESS NATIVE FOREST IS USED
A report today on the ABC asked whether in fact the pulp mill will be a plus for Tasmania - or a minus. Actuary Naomi Edwards calculates that the likelihood of large quantities of pulp from South America will cause the pulp price to fall making the pulp mill unprofitable. This would mean Gunns would have to use very cheap native forest timber to compete rather than plantation wood. Forestry Tasmania chief Bob Gordon is trying to negotiate a rock bottom price which Gunns will have to pay for pulp wood regardless of the World price (good luck Bob!) and he says that the profit figure of FT, a meagre 1.5% return for Tasmania, does not represent the true situation (difficult to understand that one, Bob).

World Today

20/9/2007: ASSESSMENT MUST INCLUDE EFFECT ON WILDLIFE - THE AGE
Any proper assessment of the pulp mill must include the long term effect on wildlife due to the intensive forest operations that will be needed to keep the pulp mill fed says Brendan Wintle and Sarah Bekessy:

Clear goalposts

19/9/2007: IFT LOBBYING IN CANBERRA
Investors for the Future of Tasmania (IFT) are lobbying in Canberra today meeting Peter Garratt and Bill Heffernan. Wotif.com founder Graeme Wood says that opponents have a lot of science on their side:

ABC report

18/9/2007: GUNNS BETTING THE COMPANY
Rarely does a company invest more in a project than the company is actually worth. Gunns is worth $1.2bn. and the pulp mill will cost at least $2bn. and probably more with cost overuns. The project is therefore a gigantic risk that will place the company in danger says the Business Australian back page today:

John Durie

18/9/2007: LENNON APPOINTS EX-FOREST BOSS
In a move calculated to infuriate anti-mill groups, Premier Paul Lennon has appointed ex-Forestry Tasmania boss Evan Rolley to be the new cabinet secretary, the most powerful civil servant in the State:

Evan Rolley

17/9/2007: JIM PEACOCK IN TASMANIA
The government chief scientist reviewing the pulp mill, Dr. Jim Peacock, is in Tasmania today for talks with some of the scientists who are opposed to the project. He will meet with Gunns tomorrow.

Chief scientist

17/9/2007: SCIENTISTS CALL FOR FURTHER TESTS
A panel of more tham 120 scientists have called for more tests before the pulp mill is approved. They say that the fast-track assessment left out vital areas and these need investigating. Gunns have replied by saying that it is just an attempt to delay the project and that they have not taken in to account advances in technology since Wesley Vale. However, many submissions to the RPDC suggested these studies were done and Gunns have ignored them so, if they end up having to do them, they will only have themselves to blame for the delay:

Scientists not happy

17/9/2007: JOHN GAY ADMITS THAT GUNNS HAS BEEN DAMAGED
In an interview with the Business Australian, Gunns' CEO John Gay admits that the pulp mill has been a public relations disaster for Gunns and that they were being pushed backwards in the financial markets. He admits now that it is far from certain that the mill will proceed and says, if it does not, Gunns will shift their focus to the mainland and Asia:

Business Australian

17/9/2007: HOBART COUNCIL WILL HOLD POLL
Hobart city council will ask its electors whether they approve of the pulp mill process. It is suggested that if there is a large no vote then Paul Lennon should resign.

16/9/2007: GREENPEACE BLOCKS PULP EXPORTS
A headline that will send shivers down the spine of Gunns' directors and shareholders if the mill goes ahead. Greenpeace regard Gunns as one of their top targets and the Tamar would be easy to block as the channel is so narrow:

Blockade

16/9/2007: PULP MILL NOW AN ISSUE IN GARRATT'S SEAT:
The Greens candidate in the Federal seat of Kingsford Smith, where shadow environmental spokesman Peter Garratt is the sitting member, has introduced the mill as an election topic. She will have to check her facts though - it isn't a paper mill!

ABC report

16/9/2007: GRAEME WOOD BLASTS PULP MILL ASSESSMENT
Graeme Wood, founder of wotif.com, appeared on Sky Business Sunday this morning and said that the pulp mill assessment had not been done properly and, unless it was thoroughly assessed and found to be non-polluting and sustainable, it should not be allowed to go ahead. He said that 4000 new jobs in tourism could be created with a bit of effort from the State Government but not if all the trees are cut down.

The Age

15/9/2007: NEW STUDY SHOWS AIR POLLUTION CAUSES STROKES AND HEART ATTACKS
A new British study shows that air particulates, especially diesel fumes, increases the likelyhood of heart attacks and strokes. This has implications with the likely tripling of heavy goods vehicles to Longreach and the particulates being emitted from the mill stack.

Medical study

15/9/2007: MILL STORY IS FRONT PAGE NEWS YET AGAIN
For the second day in succession, the pulp mill saga is on the front page of the 'Australian' newspaper. The national spotlight on the story means that unless a decision is made, it will be an election issue. The scientific committee asked by Malcolm Turnbull to look at the mill will report next week. There is also critisism of Peter Garratt from Bob Brown for shelving his environmental credentials:

Mill story in Australian

Greens lose faith in Garratt

Gunns' 20 court case blunder

15/9/2007: LENNON PUSHES FOR DECISION
Tasmanian Premier Paul Lennon has once again demanded the Federal Government make a decision (ie approve) the pulp mill before an election is called. Mr. Lennon is blaming the delay on Geoffrey Cousins intervention in Wentworth conveniently forgetting that Mr. Turnbull expanded the assessment before Mr. Cousin's intervention. Meanwhile, it has been discovered that, as the Federal Government gave Gunns money to do the IIS, their powers under the EPBC are greatly enhanced and they are legally able to assess the social and economic impacts of the mill.

ABC - new study mooted

15/9/2007: IS THE PULP MILL VIABLE? THERE ARE SERIOUS DOUBTS
Judith Ajani in the 'Canberra Times' suggests that the mill is not driven by economics but by the 'grudge factor'! She questions whether any proper economic assessment has been done to ascertain the mill's viability:

Serious doubts

There are also fears that the new pulp mill will make the existing industries in Burnie and Wesley Vale uneconomic with the loss of 600 jobs.

14/9/2007: TURNBULL SAYS DECISION WILL BE BEFORE ELECTION
Federal Environment minister Malcolm Turnbull yesterday indicated to lobby groups that a decision will be made before an election is called. However, today he said it could take longer depending on the report from Jim Peacock:

Decision soon

Could take longer

14/9/2007: WE WILL GET PERMISSION - JOHN GAY
Gunns' CEO John Gay predicts that the mill will be approved by the Federal Government in the next four weeks. He says that all the information Mr. Turnbull has to make the decision on says there are no issues with this pulp mill in Tasmania (except, perhaps, for the 31,000 submissions, Mr. Gay!).

The Australian

13/9/2007: PULP MILL DEBATE ON ABC TONIGHT
The mill will be debated on 'Difference of Opinion' on ABC at 9.25pm. The online poll on their site was running 74% against the mill at 6.15pm. (The morning after the debate, the poll was over 80% against).

Difference of opinion

13/9/2007: BASS VOTERS WANT MILL IN HAMPSHIRE
In Bass, the electorate where the mill would be built, voters do not want the mill and would prefer it to be built in Hampshire (in Braddon - where they want the mill) according to a poll commissioned by the Wilderness Society. And the Australian newspaper has obtained a submission by former pulp and paper manager, David Campin, that confirms that Hampshire is a far superior site environmentally than Longreach:

Voters want different site

12/9/2007: DON BURKE SUPPORTS MILL
Australian environmental group AEF, chaired by Don Burke, has endorsed the mill (provided it meets environmental guidelines) after a 45 minute presentation by Gunns. Apparently AEF is supported by the timber industry. It begs the question - Did they seek an alternative point of view from other sources - somehow I doubt it?

Don Burke supports mill

12/9/2007: NEW POLL SHOWS OPINION RUNNING TWO TO ONE AGAINST MILL
An opinion poll commissioned by Investors for the future of Tasmania covering all of Australia shows that ony 21% support the mill, 41% do not want it, the rest do not have an opinion. Many of those questioned said the issue would effect the way they voted. Older people were more against the mill than the young.

Pulp mill an election issue

12/9/2007: EXPERT PANEL TO ASSESS MILL
Australia's chief scientist Jim Peacock has assembled a top class panel to assess the pulp mill for Malcolm Turnbull. Click on the link below to check out who's on the panel:

Expert panel

11/9/2007: BEN QUIN RISKS ALL
Lyons Liberal candidate Ben Quin has risked being dumped from the party ticket by pointing out that Tasmania's forests could be worth twice as much as carbon credits than as woodchips:

Story in Australian

11/9/2007: DIFFERENCE OF OPINION ON PULP MILL
The ABC programme 'Difference of Opinion' will be debating the pulp mill this Thursday at 9.25pm, repeated on ABC2 on Saturday 15 Sept 9:30PM & Wednesday 19 Sept 4:30PM.

ABC website

10/9/2007: GOOGLE EXPOSES ANOTHER LIE
Gunns' adverts and various letters to newspapers have made the claim that the site for the proposed pulpmill is in the Bell Bay industrial area. This is something that the RPDC rejected some time ago. A google view of the area shows just how wrong this claim is. The Bell Bay industrial area is in the top left hand corner of the picture. The site of the proposed pulp mill is in the centre about 6 kms away:

9/9/2007: TCCI AND TAP DELEGATIONS GO TO CANBERRA
The Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry have sent a delegation to Canberra to plead with the federal government to make a decision (they mean approve) the mill before an election is called or else delay the election until a decision is made. This is rather likely to fall on deaf ears. A Tasmanians Against the Pulp mill delegation is also heading to Canberra to lobby politicians and other decision makers.

9/9/2007: BEN QUIN STAYS ON
Ben Quin remains the Liberal candidate for Lyons but has been warned to stick to the party line in future. Mr. Quin's crime was to articulate the views and fears of the electors of Lyons about the pulp mill.

8/9/2007: INVESTORS GETTING NERVOUS
Institutional investors are getting a bit nervous about the proposed pulp mill project. They are starting to question the risks involved and the possible detrimental effects on other businesses in the Tamar valley:

Investors having doubts

7/9/2007: ALP MAY HAVE TO ASSESS MILL GREENHOUSE EMISSIONS
If the mill assessment passes on to a Labor government then it could trigger a threshold that requires it to be looked at in terms of greenhouse emissions. It has been estimated that the mill would increase Australia's carbon dioxide output by 2%. Peter Garratt, however, said that there would no retrospective assessment and the project would be assessed under the present EPBC laws.

The Australian

6/9/2007: COGNITIVE DISSONANCE - SO THAT'S THE ANSWER!
Roger Hanney has come up with the name of the condition affecting most of our politicians. Cognitive dissonance is the inability to absorb any information that does not agree with their viewpoint however significant and reliable that information is:

Roger Hanney

6/9/2007: LENNON FAILS TO ANSWER KEY QUESTIONS
In an answer to Judy Tierney's probing article in the Mercury which asked many of the questions that Tasmanians would like to know the answer to, Premier Paul Lennon has written a reply. But how many of the questions does he answer? You judge:

Judy Tierney

Premier Paul Lennon

5/9/2007: CHEMICALS FROM THE PULP MILL COULD TAINT WINE
The Australian Wine Research Institute has said that the pulp mill should not proceed until further research has been done to make sure that chlorophenols produced by the mill do not taint the wine (or indeed fruit) giving it a taste of antiseptic:

Story in Australian

Chlorophenols - what are they?

5/9/2007: BEN QUIN FACES DISENDORSEMENT
There will be a Liberal party meeting on Saturday to decide if Lyons candidate Ben Quin should face disciplinary action because of his outspoken opposition to the current proposal to build a pulp mill in the Tamar valley. Not to be cowed, Mr. Quin said yesterday that the community had a right to know if Gunns were paying a fair price for the timber for the mill. Details of the deal are secret and it is suspected that the contract does not offer good value to Tasmanians who own the forests. It is difficult to see why the agreement is secret as Gunns have a virtual monopoly. If Ben Quin goes then so will the Liberals chance of winning Lyons.

4/9/2007: NEW MILL IN URUGUAY SPARKS PROTESTS
A new kraft pulp mill has just opened in Uruguay sparking protests from nearby Argentina:

Protests at Uruguayan Pulp Mill

4/9/2007: ASSESSMENT NEEDS MORE THAN SIX WEEKS
Three scientists, Dr. Warwick Raverty, Dr. Andrew Wadsley and Dr. Stuart Godfrey, have sent in a submission to Malcolm Turnbull that says six weeks is inadequate for a proper assessment of the effects of the effluent from the proposed pulp mill on Bass Strait. The submission says that dioxin contamination will affect fish within four years of the mill start-up:

Scientist's submission in text format

Clean Tamar Website

4/9/2007: TOURISM LEADERS IGNORED
Tourism operators in the Tamar valley fear that their concerns have been completely ignored by the State Parliament when it rushed through the pulp mill permits last week:

Pulp queries ignored

3/9/2007: MILL HAS NO CHANCE OF PASSING RIGOROUS SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION
The proposed pulp mill has no chance of passing the scientific examination being conducted by the Government's chief scientist Jim Peacock says Senator Bob Brown. And when it fails then the Malcolm Turnbull or Peter Garrett will have no alternative but to say no. And the story according to 'The Australian' is that the Federal Liberals were planning to nod the mill through before the State vote last week and so would then be able to point the finger of blame at Lennon when the mill stuffed up the Tamar valley. That is probably why Gunns' CEO John Gay said he was 95% certain construction would start this week. But Minister Turnbull has done his homework and realized that there are potential problems that haven't been addressed and need to be - hence his referral to Jim Peacock. This was done before the pressure applied to him by Jim Cousins so Malcolm Turnbull, in spite of flack from fellow Liberals, has done the right thing and should be congratulated.

Malcolm in a muddle

3/9/2007: MILL IS A BIG IMAGE PROBLEM
A report for the Department of Economic Development says that the perceptions created by the pulp mill has already damaged Tasmania's clean green image. The report says that the Gunns' pulp mill is the strongest negative about Tasmania:

Hobart Mercury

3/9/2007: PETER GARRATT RULES OUT PRE-ELECTION DECISION
The decision on the pulp mill is likely to be after the Federal election as shadow environment spokesman Peter Garratt says that it is unlikely he will come to a joint decision with Mr. Turnbull. This is probably going to be sometime in November and the new minister will want to review all the information before making a decision. So it is now unlikely to be before December. The RPDC said that their decision would be in November so it is likely that Gunns' decision to walk away from the RPDC process has actually delayed the decision!

2/9/2007: AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS SECTION ADVISES 'AVOID' GUNNS' SHARES
Gunns' yearly results posted a 1% increase in profits from the previous year to $88m. This was mainly due to managed investment schemes. The sale of woodchips was down to 3.4m. tonnes from 3.5m. tonnes the previous year. The Criterion column in the Business Australian rated Gunns' shares an 'AVOID' due to all the uncertainty about the pulp mill.

1/9/2007: HOWARD STILL SUPPORTING MILL
PM John Howard said yesterday that he is optimistic that the mill can and will be built providing it meets environmental standards. The man who will make the decision (provided an election does not intervene) is Malcolm Turnbull and he has started a process that will take several weeks to complete. Another hurdle for the mill is the the finance and the ANZ Bank have said they have not made a decision on whether to support the project.

The Australian

1/9/2007: GUNNS NOW CONTRADICTS ITSELF
Gunns' statement to the stock exchange that they are happy with the extra six weeks of assessment is in stark contrast to its earlier warnings that it had to start building on September 1st or the mill would become financially unviable. This has led to accusations that Gunns withdrew from the RPDC to get an easier assessment and that it was nothing to do with the timeline. The decision now could be later than the November date suggested by the RPDC back in February if the election intervenes.

Mercury report

COMMENT: THE MILL HAS STILL SEVERAL HURDLES

* The first is the Federal EPBC assessment which has attracted a huge number of submissions.
  It is possible that it may recommend that Gunns complete the deficient modeling before commencing -
  A logical decision as if the modeling is not satisfactory then Gunns would have a half-completed mill.
  This could take months to do.
* The decision may not occur before an election is called. Any decision then would have to be joint but
  Labour have said they would wait until after the election. Likely extra delay would be two months after
  the election is called.
* There has been a definite change in tone from the Federal Government - they are having a rethink.
  It is quite likely there will be an attempt to get Gunns to build it at Hampshire involving subsidies.
* The huge opposition to the mill and delays could result in finance being withdrawn. The recent financial
  downturn has resulted in less credit being available. The ANZ Bank have confirmed that they have not yet
  confirmed finance for the mill.
* The Gunns' board may decide that with all the delays and huge increase in costs that it is no longer
  financially viable or just too risky. 

31/8/2007: PM REJECTS LENNON'S PLEA
Prime Minister John Howard has rejected Tasmanian Premier Paul Lennon's plea that either the decision on the pulp mill should be made before an election is called or else the election should be delayed until after a decision. He said that due process would be followed and if an election intervened then it was too bad. The Tasmanian Parliament passed the pulp mill yesterday as expected with only the Greens, Kerry Finch, Terry Martin, Norma Jamieson and Ruth Forrest voting against. Labour MP Lisa Singh abstained and said in her speech that Gunns had too much power in Tasmania.

30/8/2007: PULP MILL NEWS IN UK
UK national daily newspaper 'The Independent' has an article on the debate:

The Independent

30/8/2007: TURNBULL EXTENDS ASSESSMENT PERIOD
Malcolm Turnbull has extended the assessment period for another 6 weeks to enable his department to consider the huge number of submissions (26,500 and rising) and to consider the recommendation from the chief Government scientist, Jim Peacock, which is due in about three weeks. Paul Lennon has said that his advice was that this was not legal but Turnbull insists that it is. If the process extends in to the election campaign then a decision will almost certainly be deferred until a new government is elected. The Tasmanian Parliament will vote today to approve the mill as expected.

30/8/2007: WOOD SUPPLY UNSUSTAINABLE - CSIRO SCIENTIST
Dr Chris Beadle, CSIRO forestry expert, has said he has deep concerns on the effect of the pulp mill on Tasmania's native forests.

Mercury report

29/8/2007: MIOTTI REPORT SAYS THERE ARE 15 DEFICIENCIES IN IIS NOT 8
The Miotti report on Gunns' IIS says that there 15 problems and that they cannot be fixed with permits. Mr.Miotti produced reports for the RPDC on the pulp mill.

Press release

28/8/2007: COUSINS GETS STUCK IN
Business man Geoffrey Cousins has shown he wasn't bluffing and has assembled a cast of over 100 stars to oppose the current assessment of the mill by Malcolm Turnbull. Full page adverts are going in the Wentworth Courier and copies of Richard Flanagan's article in 'The Monthly' are being distributed. He is also targeting Peter Garret's constituency.

People don't want the pulp mill

Apple Isle's worm turns

28/8/2007: GAY IS 95% CERTAIN IT WILL START NEXT WEEK
Gunns CEO John Gay says that he is 95% certain that pulp mill construction will start next week! This is surely a little unrealistic as submissions are not due in until Friday and then an independent committee has to investigate and report back. As well as that the Greens are considering a court challenge on the assessment process by SWECO. Apparently, the SWECO assessment has failed to observe details of the Pulp Mill Assessment Act.

27/8/2007: GUNNS' BOARD HAS NOT APPROVED PULP MILL GO-AHEAD
In an interview with the Mercury newspaper, Gunns' CEO John Gay says that the Gunns' board may not approve the construction of the pulp mill even if it receives all the approvals. He said that the Board is by no means united on the issue and that it was the Board, not him, that voted to withdraw the pulp mill from the RPDC process. But hang on, were we not told in the court case that all the contracts had been signed for construction to start on September 1st? Or was that just to put pressure on the Judge? Mr. Gay seems to be under the impression that the mill is all about trees. Well, it's not Mr. Gay, it's all about where you want to build the mill and you, the Gunns' Board, have chosen the wrong site.

The John Gay interview

26/8/2007: WILDERNESS SOCIETY CAMPAIGNING IN WENTWORTH
The Wilderness Society were handing out DVDs and leaflets about the pulp mill in Malcolm Turnbull's constituency in Sydney today and encouraging people to write a submission.

26/8/2007: DOCTORS SLAM PULP MILL ASSESSMENT
A group of 100 medical doctors from Launceston and the Tamar valley have signed a petition that condemns the current assessment as totally inadequate and urges the MLCs to vote against it. Some of the doctors said that they might leave Tasmania if it goes ahead. The only dentist in the Tamar valley is on record as saying he will leave if the pulp mill proceeds and rural areas are finding it very difficult to replace these professions when they leave. And a group of photographers have sent in a petition claiming that forestry practises are ruining Tasmania's famed natural beauty.

The Mercury

25/8/2007: GAY UNFIT TO RUN PUBLIC COMPANY
According to an article in today's Mercury, Geoffrey Cousins has labeled Gunns CEO John Gay unfit to run a public company after Mr. Gay threatened to withdraw Gunns' business from any company that Mr. Cousins was a director of. Mr.Cousins said that it was typical of Gunns' mentality - Don't deal with the issue but attack the person who said it.

25/8/2007: WHO WAS THE STUPID BASTARD THAT DID THAT?
Senator Bill Heffernan has come out in favour of the mill being moved from Longreach to Hampshire. He said that pulp mills of the type that Gunns wanted to build were polluting waterways and fisheries all around the planet. He said that we did not want to look back in 100 years and say 'Who was the stupid bastard that did that?'.

The Australian

25/8/2007: ONLINE POLLS SPELL DISASTER FOR MILL
It seems that support for the pulp mill has totally collapsed in Tasmania. In an online poll in the Hobart Mercury, by 5pm today, only 34 people had answered YES to the question 'Should the pulp mill go ahead?. 4750 people voted NO - more than 99%. And in 'The AGE', a poll asks if the decision to build a pulp mill in the Tamar valley would influence the way they voted. 86% said YES.

24/8/2007: PM DELAYS PULP MILL DECISION
John Howard said today that no decision will be taken until all public consultation had taken place and that we should not expect an early decision on the mill.

The Australian

24/8/2007: MOVE TO SHIFT MILL TO HAMPSHIRE
The 'Australian' newspaper has had the pulp mill story on its front page four days this week and today Geoffrey Cousins is urging Turnbull to shift the mill to Hampshire. (This is what this site has always said - the mill is in the wrong place). Mr. Cousins said it is a win/win situation with Hampshire wanting the mill and voters in Bass and Lyons against it. There could be three seats in it for the Liberals. Gunns' CEO John Gay, however, said that it would be built in China or Indonesia if Longreach was turned down.

The Australian

24/8/2007: PERMITS WILL OFFER NO PROTECTION
The pulp mill operating permits will not provide any protection against pollution due to the wording of the permits which say that pollution must be substantial before any action is taken. However, nowhere is there a description of substantial! So, Gunns' lawyers will be able to defend any breaches.

Mercury report

23/8/2007: LETTER FROM KONS TO VINEYARDS
State minister Steve Kons has written to Vineyard operators in the Tamar valley to allay fears of odours. It basically says 'Don't worry guys, it will probably only smell 10 times a year and if you're unhappy you can sue Gunns'! Perhaps the vineyard owners should sue Mr. Kons!

Mr. Kons letter

23/8/2007: NOT HAPPY PAUL! - 67% DISSATISFIED WITH LENNON
A new poll released today indicates that over two thirds of the Tasmanian population are not happy with the way that Paul Lennon is running the State ie. handling the pulp mill issue.

23/8/2007: SURVEY PAINTS A GLOOMY PICTURE IF MILL PROCEEDS
A survey conducted by businesses in northern Tasmania says that the pulp mill will cost far more jobs than it creates and will only grow the economy by 0.5% not the 2.5% that Gunns have claimed. It will also lead to 216 deaths due to extra log trucks and respiratory diseases.

Mercury report

22/8/2007: DIOXINS GET TURNBULL RATTLED
On the 7.30 report tonight, Malcolm Turn bull faced some rather sticky questions about the pulp mill and particularly dioxins:

7.30 report transcript

22/8/2007: SWECO BOSS ADMITS IT WILL SMELL
Swedish engineer Rune Franzen, in charge of the SWECO team assessing the mill, admits it will smell and that leaks from pump seals which can occur has not been assessed at all. He said that the smells will be worse in the first three years but it should then settle down. But the odour from leaking seals can occur for the life of the mill.

22/8/2007: PERMITS SERIOUSLY DEFICIENT
The pulp mill permits tabled in Parliament fall a long way short of expectations:

* If the mill pollutes it will not be shut down.
* If the mill smells it will not be shut down.
* The odour panel has no mechanism for reporting.
* Residents with a good sense of smell will not be allowed on the odour panel.
* The Environmental Protection Agency will have no staff.
* No conditions or regulation of wood and chemical trucks.
* No obligation to use rail for longer distances.

22/8/2007: GEOFF COUSINS TAKES ON TURNBULL
Businessman Geoff Cousins is taking on federal environmental minister Malcolm Turnbull in his own seat of Wentworth which is only held by a margin of 3%. Mr. Cousins says he will pay for adverts in local newspapers to try and get Mr. Turnbull to change his mind. Mr. Turnbull says he will not be bullied.

Article in Australian

21/8/2007: WEST TAMAR COUNCIL CONDEMNS FAST TRACK PROCESS
At today's Council meeting, councilors voted unanimously to condemn the State Government fast track process.

21/8/2007: PERMITS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING
The pulp mill permits were tabled in Parliament this morning and are available at this website:

Pulp mill permits

21/8/2007: STATE LIBERALS SAY THERE SHOULD BE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON PERMITS
State Liberal leader Will Hodgeman has said that there is no public confidence in the assessment process and that the State Government should allow the public to view and comment on the permits. It does not seem very likely that this will happen as no doubt opponents will find a plethora of mistakes and faults in the permits and communicate their concerns to the MLCs - something the Government will be keen to avoid. So much for transparency! There was another item on the pulp mill on the 7.30 report last night. Here is the transcript:

7.30 report

COMMENT: TURNBULL IS SAYING WHATEVER HAPPENS IT'S NOT MY FAULT
Malcolm Turnbull is playing the blame game. He is hoping that he will not get blamed for either saying yes or saying no. He is actually saying perhaps and postponing a definite decision until after the Parliament votes and, you never know, he (in fact all Tasmanians) might get lucky and not have to make one if the MLCs say no. If he does have to make the decision and it all goes pear-shaped he can point to his statements and say 'it's not my fault - I did warn you it was not a satisfactory assessment'. Turnbull's argument is that he only has a mandate on Commonwealth waters but we all know that the Federal Government could stop it if they wanted. They stopped the Franklin dam, they are taking over water resources on the mainland and a hospital in Tasmania. So, come on Mr.Turnbull. It's your duty to protect us from this shonky assessment and dishonest State Government.

20/8/2007: TURNBULL SAYS MILL CAN PROCEED IF...
Federal Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull said in a press release yesterday that he would make a decision on the proposed pulp mill in September. There will be more conditions that Gunns have to comply with and another 10 days of public comment. Turnbull will also be asking for a review by Australia's chief scientist Jim Peacock. He says that a decision in favour is by no means certain but that the Federal Government could only turn it down if it affects Commonwealth waters. The assessment does not cover the Tamar estuary or the inshore fishing waters which his department says could become seriously polluted if the mill goes ahead. Turnbull also criticised the Tasmanian Government for its ham-fisted approach which had lost the confidence of the people. He has written to Paul Lennon to express his concerns.

Green light for mill

Turnbull's pollution concerns

Turnbull's letter to Lennon

The 24 conditions

Invitation to comment

19/8/2007: BEN QUIN CRITICISES LACK OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION
Lyons Liberal candidate Ben Quin has said in the ABC Stateline program that he will oppose the pulp mill if the present process does not allow for more public consultation. He also said that the present yes/no vote is plainly unsatisfactory and that producing these permits at the last minute shows a total lack of Government management.

Stateline transcript

19/8/2007: WINE GROUP BLASTS MILL
Tasmania's wine industry group (WIT) has sent in a submission that says atmospheric pollution and smells from the pulp mill could devastate the Tamar Valley wine region. The assessment comes even though Gunns is a member of the group. WIT is particularly annoyed that Gunns has exemptions from the laws regarding emissions such as hydrogen sulphide (rotten egg gas).

18/8/2007: RUTH RELEASES FULL REPORT
Independent MLC Ruth Forrest has now issued a full report from the visit to Nueva Aldea pulp mill in Chile. It does not make for encouraging reading for residents of the Tamar valley:

* The mill operators claim that there were only 3/4 odour incidents in the first year lasting about an hour.
* The locals in a village 12kms away however reported frequent odours which are still continuing.
* There have been gastro' upsets, nausea, headaches and vomiting.
* A school had to be closed for the day and a church service cancelled because of the smell.
* Cellar door sales of wine have been badly affected.
* The river developed a brownish foam.
* Very little economic benefit for the locals. No benefit from pulp mill tourism.
* Lack of transparency in monitoring and lack of trust in the company.
* They recommend open and transparent independent monitoring if one is built in Tasmania.

Press release

18/8/2007: MINISTER TO ANNOUNCE 'PACKAGE' ON MONDAY
The Department of the Environment has said that Malcolm Turnbull has been working on a 'package' for the pulp mill proposal and this will be announced possibly on Monday. Senator Bill Heffernan has hinted that Turnbull is not satisfied with Gunns' proposal as it stands and that a full assessment may be undertaken. This would take several months. Meanwhile, Lyons Liberal candidate Ben Quin says that he would not support the pulp mill unless there was a proper period of comment on the permits and conditions.

Ben Quin story

18/8/2007: SWECO REPORT DEFECTIVE - PROF.WADSLEY
Professor Andrew Wadsley of Australian Risk Audit has reviewed the SWECO report and found that it is unsatisfactory. Some of the reports criticisms are that there are misleading or untrue statements, it does not assess environmental impacts as defined in the 2007 pulp mill assessment bill and there are no dioxin calculations:

Professor Wadsley's report

17/8/2007: RUTH FORREST SPILLS THE BEANS
Independent MLC Ruth Forrest has released her report on the Nueva Aldea pulp mill that the MLCs visited on their fact finding tour. She found that locals had been affected by foul odours, local businesses had been affected and people made ill by the emissions.

Press release

17/8/2007: LISA SINGH LOBBIES FOR CONSCIENCE VOTE
Labor MHR is again asking her party for a free vote on the pulp mill. It is not clear if she will be prepared to cross the floor and vote against it.

16/8/2007: MILL IS 58% NON-COMPLIANT - NATIONAL TOXICS NETWORK
A report released today says that the pulp mill proposal is far more non-compliant that the 8% that the SWECO report claims. It says that SWECO were unable to do a proper assessment because of limitations in the State Government brief. In other words, they did not want them to look too hard at the proposal!

Full report from National Toxics Network

16/8/2007: PERMITS 1100 PAGES LONG!
The permits for the pulp mill which have to be read and understood by parliamentarians before they can vote (in theory anyway) are 1100 pages long! Some MLCs are pretty angry at the timeframe and are thinking of trying to delay the vote. The other problem is that they will not be able to change anything. They either vote yes or no.

15/8/2007: BUSINESSMAN, PM'S FRIEND, COMES OUT AGAINST MILL
Geoffrey Cousins, a businessman and friend of PM John Howard, has said that the Federal Government has a duty to make sure that the pulp mill proposal is properly assessed, that it plainly was not as present and that the State Government seems to be in Gunns' pocket. He also said that to put a pulp mill in such a beautiful area, a wine producing region, was madness unless it was comprehensively assessed and everyone allowed to have their say and that this was the first real test for Malcolm Turnbull to make sure due process is carried out. It is now considered unlikely that Mr.Turnbull will give his decision until after the vote in the Tasmanian Parliament.

Report in the Australian

15/8/2007: HUGE TURNOUT AT WEST TAMAR COUNCIL MEETING
Hundreds of people had to be excluded from the special West Tamar Council meeting yesterday evening whilst 600 squeezed in to the venue in Beaconsfield. Councillors were left in no doubt as to the feelings of the local community as speaker after speaker blasted the mill and the Council and Mayor, Barry Easther, for not opposing it. There were suggestions of civil unrest if it went ahead.

Bob McMahon's speech - a standing ovation!

14/8/2007: WILDERNESS SOCIETY TO APPEAL
The Tasmanian Wilderness Society is going to appeal against the court ruling which went against them last week it was announced today. And yesterday Senator Christine Milne asked Senator Abetz about the problems with the effluent. It comes as no surprise that Senator Abetz did not give any satisfactory answers:

Account of exchange in Senate

13/8/2007: POLLIES REPORT SUCCESSFUL FACT FINDING TRIP
The MLCs and other politicians have returned from their tour to South America and Finland and, surprise surprise, they have reported back that they have detected little if any odour around the pulp mills they visited. I wonder if they asked any locals? The mills knew they were coming and would have made sure that they did not have a smelly day. If you were a health inspector would you give a restaurant 3 weeks notice of your visit? Why didn't they ask people in Tumut NSW where a kraft pulp mill has been operating since 2001?

WHY HAVE WE NOT HAD THE FEDERAL ASSESSMENT DECISION YET?
A spokesman for the Federal Department of the Environment said that the decision on the pulp mill EPBC assessment would probably be announced on Friday after the court case. But there has been no announcement. Why? It is in everyone's interest that we all know as soon as possible. What possible explanation is there for the delay? Here are some possibilities:

* The Federal Government is assessing  what decision would be best for its electoral fortunes. This is a 
  cynical comment but it is almost certain to come in to their calculations as a YES would be unpopular
  not only in Bass, where a decision in favour will sink sitting Liberal MP Michael Ferguson, but also on
  the mainland. Add to that the probability of demonstrations during the election campaign and it all adds
  up to a potential nightmare for the Liberals.
* The proposal is not up to scratch and the department is trying to get Gunns to agree to changes that
  would not only make it acceptable but also limit the likely legal challenge that would result.
* Minister Malcolm Turnbull has not made his mind up yet. Well, Mr.Turnbull, if you have to think about
  it, the answer is NO!  

Reasons why the pulp mill should be built at Hampshire

10/8/2007: WEST TAMAR COUNCIL GET 99 SUBMISSIONS
West Tamar Council are holding a special meeting on Tuesday 14th August to discuss the pulp mill. They have received 99 submissions with 42 people wishing to address the meeting. It demonstrates that feelings are running pretty high in the West Tamar area.

9/8/2007: FEDERAL COURT REJECTS CHALLENGE
The Federal Court has thrown out the challenge to the assessment process on all counts. The Wilderness Society are considering an appeal. We now await the Minister's decision which could come as soon as tomorrow. The other option for opponents is to appeal against the Minister's decision which may be more succesful as it is on record that Mr.Turnbull has received advice that the effluent could damage wildlife in Commonwealth waters.

Malcolm Turnbull urges Lennon to consider issues raised by the local community

8/8/2007: 64% DO